JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 3, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Isidro Garcia Garcia Vs. Gobernacion Del Departamento De Cundinamarca

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Superior De Bogota Sala Civil Y El Juzgado 44 Administrativo Del Circuito De Bogota. Deja Sin Efecto El Auto De La Sala Civil Del Tribunal Superior De Bogota Del 30 De Agosto De 2007 Y Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Sala Civil Del Tribunal Superior De Bogota Para Que Resuelva La Impugnacion Formulada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Inexistencia por haber sido repartido a un despacho judicial competente
  • Autoridad judicial encargada de tramitar la impugnación no puede negarse a dictar sentencia de segunda instancia
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Dejar sin efecto el auto de la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogota de agosto 30 de 2007, dentro del proceso de accion de tutela de Isidro Garcia Garcia contra la Gobernacion del Departamento de Cundinamarca.
  2. Segundo. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogota para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la impugnacion formulada del proceso de accion de tutela de la referencia.
  3. Tercero. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, al Juzgado 3deg Civil del Circuito de Bogota y al Juzgado 44 Administrativo del Circuito de Bogota, con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.